VTU Official Circular : Guidelines for conducting the examination evaluation of answer script and Question paper pattern for the subject 10BT65 Chemical Equipment Design and CAED
1. The subject to be taught in class room for design and execution of the design to be carried out in the CAED Lab as drawing.
2. Pattern of the question paper:
i) Two full questions will be set for 100 marks and student should answer any one full question
ii) Each question will have two sub questions
(a) will be for 10 marks for free hand sketch and sub question
(b) will be for 90 marks of which 50 marks is for designing for by calculations and 40 marks for CAED on the computer system using software.
3. Part (a) to be drawn as a free hand sketch in the sketch book provided and the part (b) to be done in the answer booklet by calculations.
4. The subject to be conducted as theory (not as laboratory exam for 4 hours)
5. Since drawing is also done, the examination may be conducted in computer equipment rooms/lab.
6. To avoid the exchange of print outs, provisions may be made to print the IP number of the computer on the print outs of the drawing.
7. The valuations should be centralised like any other theory paper.
Many students make mistakes in filling the details on the front page, one time or the other, in the VTU semester exams. This article in intended to give an insight on their consequences. The mistakes can be classified into two types based on their importance:
The first category is the OMR marking. Since it is both economical and fast for VTU to identify vital answer script details through OMR, they have implemented it in the recent years. There are four OMR fields:
4) Questions Answered
Making mistakes in any of these OMR markings can have bad consequences especially USN. Since these markings are automatically processed by an OMR reader, any mistakes might result in scrambling of identities of papers or incorrect valuation and the students might end up wasting lot of their time makings rounds to VTU. In case of the “Questions Answered” mistakes, there could be some problems in digital valuation especially when marks need to be awarded for wrong questions.
The second category is the handwritten details like subject code, subject name, USN, date, signature, usn and signatures on every page etc. These details almost do not matter because the front page and the top part of answer script pages are cut off before scanning for digital valuation. But in very rare cases they might result in problems which can be solved by approaching the university through your college.
** TIP : Always try to write your usn and sign on the sheets you have written since this is students-pro initiative by VTU. This is actually a measure by VTU taken to fight illegal scrambling of sheets by brokers through bribes.
Hope this helps. If you have any doubts please feel free to comment. If you like this article please share it with your friends through any of the buttons on the left.
This is an old post written in 2012 when a group students filed a petition against the VTU year back system. The result was the Hight Court of Karnataka ruled out the petition that students should know the rules before joining VTU or any of its affiliated colleges. The current rules for year back are as follows :
1) To advance to next year, the student should not have more than 4 backlogs in the current and previous years together.
Eg: If the student is in 1st year and he has 5 backlogs at the end of the 2nd semester, he won’t be permitted to study 2nd year.
2) There should not be any backlog in the previous year (Eg : 1st year) to be eligible to be promoted to the next year(Eg: 3rd year) from the current year (Eg: 2nd year).
If you have any doubts or comments use the comment form below.
News Dated August 26th 2012
Giving relief to thousands of engineering students across the state, the High Court of Karnataka has clamped an interim stay on the controversial carry over system introduced by the Visveswaraya Technological University (VTU).
News Dated August 29th 2012
The Karnataka high court’s interim order came as a relief for the students of Visvesvaraya Technological University. The HC had allowed a group of engineering students to be promoted even if they had a carry over of more than four subjects. The varsity vice-chancellor, S Maheshwarappa, however, told Bangalore Mirror the order holds good only for the 100 students who had originally filed the petition.
News Dated August 31st 2012
With the High Court adjourning the hearing on a plea challenging the varsity’s carry-over system on Thursday, the ongoing tussle between BE students and administration of the Visvesvaraya Technological University (VTU) is set to continue.After the case came up for hearing, lawyers of a few more students who filed similar petitions against the university approached the High Court, asking that all the pleas be clubbed and heard together. Hence the hundred-odd students, who were given an interim order by the High Court granting them admission to the next semesters of their courses, will now have to wait for the final verdict.
The Carry Over System of VTU
The present carry over system of VTU specifies that a B.E. student cannot advance to next year if he has more than 4 backlogs in the preceding year. And he cannot enter the 3rd year if he has ANY backlogs in the 1st year. Similarly he cannot enter the 4th year if he has ANY backlogs in the 2nd year. This is the case with non-autonomous colleges affiliated with VTU. However autonomous colleges affiliated with VTU conduct supplementary exams if a student fails in the semester exams. Any student who thinks about this distinction asks the question “Why not the supplementary exams to non-autonomous colleges affiliated to VTU?“.
However in the case of JNTU, the major university for B.Tech. in the neighboring state of Andhra Pradesh; promotion to the next year is based on credits irrespective of the number of backlogs. This kind of credit based promotion leads to stress-free environment where students who are weak academically have better chances to make-up for their backlogs.
Over a hundred students filed a petition at the High Court of Karnataka, which resulted in a interim order saying that the students should be permitted to the next year without any restrictions. Rumors that this will be a general rule spread very quickly since VTU has not made any comments on the verdict immediately.The advocate for the students was S Armugham.
VTU , after two days, made an official statement confirming that the verdict holds good only to the hundred odd students who filed the petition.
The New Hearing
Meanwhile the lawyers of a few other students (who are going to loose an year because of the current carry over system) who filed similar petitions against the university approached the High Court asking the petitions to be clubbed and heard together. Now the hundred odd students who filed the petition first have to wait for the final verdict of the High Court.
VTU vice-chancellor H Maheshappa commented on the interim order saying that “We are presenting our argument against this order. For students who are nor part of this petition, on which the interim order has been issued, there will be no admissions. The focus of the students should be on studying and excelling in exams. If they do, this rule will not seem insurmountable.”
The student comments collected from various sources on the internet about the petitions:
The back-year concept does not exist in other universities in India or anywhere else in the worldl!!!! We request VTU to abolish this concept because it does not really serve the purpose of creating quality engineers. It only creates more and more stress and forces us to learn our modules just for the sake of passing an exam. Varun
The back-year concept does not exist in other universities in India or anywhere else in the worldl!!!! We request VTU to abolish this concept because it does not really serve the purpose of creating quality engineers. It only creates more and more stress and forces us to learn our modules just for the sake of passing an exam. They only notice the student get backlog.why don’t they ensure that every college has well-qualified and quality lecturers and sufficient coaching is provided to produce quality students rather than having a system that penalises them.I request the high court to intervene,lot of student eye’s are on your judgement. I request you to cancel this system and save lives.
VTU’s detention policy for engineering students seems ridiculous. Quality production of engineers requires proper planning, quality teaching faculty, students friendly atmosphere of the college. This policy has brought down its dignity only. My son has been the victim of vtus policy. He is not allowed to stay in the hostel also. This harsh decision of vtu has compelled me to keep my son outside paying huge amount of money. The vtu has inflicted rigorous punishment on the parents through their wards. Is it fair for the vtu to send out the students from its colleges without informing/communicating their parents ? If any untoward incidence takes place, will the vtu held responsible ? The students of NE states have become the victims vtu as well as communal riots. Shameful. The Karnataka government also should not keep mum in this regard. Collective effort made by the victims(students)of vtu is appreciable. We are optimistic, hon’ble court will deliver fair iudgement for the sake these students. Paddam, Sikkim. Padam
VTU is an educational institution and behaving like a political one. do they even know what students have to go through? in many colleges they are not given hostels because they have been detained,which forces them to stay outside without basic facilities.they’ve to struggle each and every day of their life. what about the mental frustration and torture they face..specially critical subject backs… in VTU even many toppers have faced backlogs.. and if a student is trying hard to keep up cleared all subjects so VTU’s method of appreciation is YEAR BACK, 1 subject.u can make an exception.every1 is not a born genius. there are people in administration and faculty of many colleges who cant even speak proper grammatically correct english. and wake up VTU! quality engineers does not mean they’ve to be nerds. i know a guy who is an ethical hacker and doesnt need a degree to get a job..and he is sitting with an year back.. dont measure a student’s potential according to books. i know a guy who met with an accident and was unable to appear for his exam he also got detained.that student was a topper. and if you want to give good engineers to the country reduce the pressure on students which even forces many into drugs and other addictions. giving two exams back to back one is ELECTIVE other is CRITICAL the people who set the paper can they themselves face the situation? because the student has more subjects to attend to. VTU think!!! sudeep
Is this is you call it a law? How can one get a grant of admission when others are facing the same problem? Is it not shows that people who have money to purchase the law? Mr. Maheswarapa must have to be sacked from his roles because he failed in giving the justice for many of the students. First he should be proven he was not involved in any of duplication of thesis while he was doing his Doctorate. Such rogues should be kept out of VTU to get proper justice to common students. Do not play with the life of the students. It is an alarming sign for the impotent government Manjunath
Do reply your comments about this using the comment form below